You are here

J Hypertens DOI:10.1097/HJH.0000000000000470

Metabolomics of renal venous plasma from individuals with unilateral renal artery stenosis and essential hypertension.

Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2015
AuthorsRhee, EP, Clish, CB, Pierce, KA, Saad, A, Lerman, LO, Textor, SC
JournalJ Hypertens
Volume33
Issue4
Pages836-42
Date Published2015 Apr
ISSN1473-5598
KeywordsAdult, Aged, Antihypertensive Agents, Atherosclerosis, Chromatography, Liquid, Female, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Hypertension, Kidney, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mass Spectrometry, Metabolomics, Middle Aged, Renal Artery Obstruction, Renal Circulation, Renal Veins
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the metabolite profiles of venous effluent from both kidneys of individuals with unilateral atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) in order to directly examine how impaired renal blood flow impacts small-molecule handling in humans.

METHODS: We applied liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry based metabolite profiling to venous plasma obtained from the stenotic (STK) and contralateral (CLK) kidneys of ARAS patients (n = 16), and both the kidneys of essential hypertensive controls (n = 11). Study samples were acquired during a 3-day protocol that included iothalamate clearance measurements, radiographic kidney phenotyping (Duplex ultrasound, multidetector computed tomography, and blood-oxygen-level-dependent MRI), and controlled sodium and caloric intake and antihypertensive treatment.

RESULTS: Partial least squares-discriminant analysis demonstrated clear separation of essential hypertensive kidney metabolite profiles versus STK and CLK metabolite profiles, but no separation between metabolite profiles of STK and CLK samples. All of the discriminating metabolites were similarly elevated in the STK and CLK samples, likely reflecting the lower glomerular filtration rate in the ARAS versus essential hypertensive individuals (mean 66.1 versus 89.2  ml/min per 1.73 m). In a paired analysis within the ARAS group, no metabolite was significantly altered in STK compared with CLK samples; notably, creatinine was the same in STK and CLK samples (STK/CLK ratio = 1.0, P = 0.9). Results were unchanged in an examination of ARAS patients in the bottom half of renal tissue perfusion or oxygenation.

CONCLUSION: Metabolite profiling does not differentiate venous effluent from STKs or CLKs in individuals with unilateral ARAS, despite the measurable loss of kidney volume and blood flow on the affected side. These findings are consistent with the kidney's ability to adapt to ARAS to maintain a range of metabolic functions.

URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000000470
DOI10.1097/HJH.0000000000000470
Pubmed

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25490710?dopt=Abstract

Alternate JournalJ. Hypertens.
PubMed ID25490710
PubMed Central IDPMC4354459
Grant ListR01-DK100081 / DK / NIDDK NIH HHS / United States
P01-HL-085307 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
R01 DK100081 / DK / NIDDK NIH HHS / United States
K08-DK-090142 / DK / NIDDK NIH HHS / United States
UL1 TR000135 / TR / NCATS NIH HHS / United States
UL1-RR-024150 / RR / NCRR NIH HHS / United States