You are here

Nature methods DOI:10.1038/nmeth.2483

Comparative analysis of RNA sequencing methods for degraded or low-input samples.

Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2013
AuthorsAdiconis, X, Borges-Rivera, D, Satija, R, Deluca, DS, Busby, MA, Berlin, AM, Sivachenko, A, Thompson, DA, Wysoker, A, Fennell, T, Gnirke, A, Pochet, N, Regev, A, Levin, JZ
JournalNature methods
Date Published2013/05/19
ISSN1548-7091
Abstract

RNA-seq is an effective method for studying the transcriptome, but it can be difficult to apply to scarce or degraded RNA from fixed clinical samples, rare cell populations or cadavers. Recent studies have proposed several methods for RNA-seq of low-quality and/or low-quantity samples, but the relative merits of these methods have not been systematically analyzed. Here we compare five such methods using metrics relevant to transcriptome annotation, transcript discovery and gene expression. Using a single human RNA sample, we constructed and sequenced ten libraries with these methods and compared them against two control libraries. We found that the RNase H method performed best for chemically fragmented, low-quality RNA, and we confirmed this through analysis of actual degraded samples. RNase H can even effectively replace oligo(dT)-based methods for standard RNA-seq. SMART and NuGEN had distinct strengths for measuring low-quantity RNA. Our analysis allows biologists to select the most suitable methods and provides a benchmark for future method development.

URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2483
DOI10.1038/nmeth.2483
Pubmed

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23685885?dopt=Abstract