You are here

Nat Genet DOI:10.1038/ng1333

Assessing the impact of population stratification on genetic association studies.

Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2004
AuthorsFreedman, ML, Reich, D, Penney, KL, McDonald, GJ, Mignault, AA, Patterson, N, Gabriel, SB, Topol, EJ, Smoller, JW, Pato, CN, Pato, MT, Petryshen, TL, Kolonel, LN, Lander, ES, Sklar, P, Henderson, B, Hirschhorn, JN, Altshuler, D
JournalNat Genet
Volume36
Issue4
Pages388-93
Date Published2004 Apr
ISSN1061-4036
KeywordsCase-Control Studies, Cohort Studies, Genetics, Population, Humans, Mutation, Missense, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
Abstract

Population stratification refers to differences in allele frequencies between cases and controls due to systematic differences in ancestry rather than association of genes with disease. It has been proposed that false positive associations due to stratification can be controlled by genotyping a few dozen unlinked genetic markers. To assess stratification empirically, we analyzed data from 11 case-control and case-cohort association studies. We did not detect statistically significant evidence for stratification but did observe that assessments based on a few dozen markers lack power to rule out moderate levels of stratification that could cause false positive associations in studies designed to detect modest genetic risk factors. After increasing the number of markers and samples in a case-cohort study (the design most immune to stratification), we found that stratification was in fact present. Our results suggest that modest amounts of stratification can exist even in well designed studies.

URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1333
DOI10.1038/ng1333
Pubmed

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15052270?dopt=Abstract

Alternate JournalNat. Genet.
PubMed ID15052270