Romberg's test revisited: Changes in classical and advanced sway metrics in patients with pure sensory neuropathy.

Neurophysiologie clinique = Clinical neurophysiology
Authors
Keywords
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Romberg test, undoubtedly a classical and well-established method in physical neurological assessment of patients with sensory ataxia, has long been suspected to be prone to several limitations. Here, we quantified upright stance before and after visual deprivation in a selected cohort of patients with pure sensory neuropathy.METHODS: Static balance was assessed in sensory neuropathy patients during quiet stance on a force platform under different visual and proprioceptive feedback conditions. Sural nerve neurography was employed to evaluate the severity of peripheral neuropathy. Conventional and advanced postural sway metrics were investigated to draw a quantitative analogy to the clinical Romberg test.RESULTS: Posturographic analyses showed that patients displayed Romberg and vestibular Romberg quotient values around 2, indicating an approximately twofold increase in body sway in the absence of vision. However, the diagnostic discrimination ability between patients and controls was only modest. Even less impactful were the diagnostic contributions of frequency domain and non-linear sway analyses. This was primarily attributed to the heightened body sway exhibited by patients with sensory neuropathy under 'eyes open' conditions, diminishing the contrast with the 'eyes closed' condition as assessed in the classical Romberg test.CONCLUSION: We conclude that the Romberg test, even in its quantitative form with the aid of an apparatus, had an unsatisfactory classification value in terms of distinguishing patients from healthy controls. Instead, it should be interpreted within the comprehensive context of the broader neurological examination and the electrodiagnosis of peripheral nerve function.

Year of Publication
2024
Journal
Neurophysiologie clinique = Clinical neurophysiology
Volume
54
Issue
5
Pages
102999
Date Published
07/2024
ISSN
1769-7131
DOI
10.1016/j.neucli.2024.102999
PubMed ID
39042993
Links