Tagged with #mapping quality
0 documentation articles | 0 announcements | 3 forum discussions


No posts found with the requested search criteria.
No posts found with the requested search criteria.

Created 2013-10-16 17:01:02 | Updated | Tags:
Comments (3)

Greetings!

I was wondering if GATK uses the MAPQ column in the sam file in any of its calculations?

Thanks! Stephanie


Created 2013-06-03 22:42:48 | Updated 2013-06-03 22:44:22 | Tags: gatkpapergenotyper bowtie
Comments (6)

Hello!

I'm trying to call variants from bowtie-aligned reads, I used PrintReads with ReassignMappingQuality filter to give all reads a mapping score of 60 to replace default value of 255. However, I'm wondering if this assignment would introduce any bias in variant calling.

Thanks a lot!


Created 2013-02-19 08:52:12 | Updated 2013-02-19 08:53:31 | Tags: reassignmappingquality
Comments (4)

Dear GATK team,

I noticed you offered an unsupported option for handling bam files with non-standard Mapping Qualities: e.g. "adding -rf ReassignMappingQuality -DMQ 60 to your command-line would change all mapping qualities in your bam to 60."

Could I make a request for an option to offset the mapping qualities, for example with -1 ? So that 255 -1 becomes 254 ? I do not want to reassign all my reads with one value, but rather, offset the values to preserve the differences in MQ.

The reason I propose this is that some of us use aligners like the STAR aligner, and in this case 255 is given to uniquely mapped reads (useful for programs like STAR/Tophat/Cufflniks). This breaks convention, I know, but it would be useful to offset the MQ in GATK rather than run an awk command and generate a separate bam file just for variant calling.