Hulsmans M, Clauss S, Xiao L, et al. Macrophages Facilitate Electrical Conduction in the Heart. Cell. 2017;169(3):510-522.e20. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.03.050PubMedGoogle ScholarDOI
Prins BP, Mead TJ, Brody JA, et al. Exome-chip meta-analysis identifies novel loci associated with cardiac conduction, including ADAMTS6. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1):87. doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1457-6PubMedGoogle ScholarDOI
Lam PY, Mendu SK, Mills RW, et al. A high-conductance chemo-optogenetic system based on the vertebrate channel Trpa1b. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):11839. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-11791-zPubMedGoogle ScholarDOI
Macri V, Brody JA, Arking DE, et al. Common Coding Variants in Are Associated With the Nav1.8 Late Current and Cardiac Conduction. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2018;11(5):e001663. doi:10.1161/CIRCGEN.116.001663PubMedGoogle ScholarDOI
Smith G, Lowe JK, Kovvali S, et al. Genome-wide association study of electrocardiographic conduction measures in an isolated founder population: Kosrae. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6(5):634-41. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.02.022PubMedGoogle ScholarDOI
Choi EK, Park JH, Lee JY, et al. Korean Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Network: Genetic Variants for AF Do Not Predict Ablation Success. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(8):e002046. doi:10.1161/JAHA.115.002046PubMedGoogle ScholarDOI
MacRae CA. In vitro and in vivo reprogramming for the conduction system. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2016;26(1):21-2. doi:10.1016/j.tcm.2015.08.005PubMedGoogle ScholarDOI
Tucker NR, Clauss S, Ellinor PT. Common variation in atrial fibrillation: navigating the path from genetic association to mechanism. Cardiovasc Res. 2016;109(4):493-501. doi:10.1093/cvr/cvv283PubMedGoogle ScholarDOI