1.
Gaudelli NM, Komor AC, Rees HA, et al. Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature. 2017;551(7681):464-471. doi:10.1038/nature24644.
1.
Hu JH, Miller SM, Geurts MH, et al. Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity. Nature. 2018;556(7699):57-63. doi:10.1038/nature26155.
1.
Rohland N, Reich D. Cost-effective, high-throughput DNA sequencing libraries for multiplexed target capture. Genome Res. 2012;22(5):939-46. doi:10.1101/gr.128124.111.
1.
Cong L, Ran A, Cox D, et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science. 2013;339(6121):819-23. doi:10.1126/science.1231143.
1.
Cong L, Zhang F. Genome engineering using CRISPR-Cas9 system. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1239:197-217. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-1862-1_10.
1.
Slaymaker IM, Gao L, Zetsche B, Scott DA, Yan WX, Zhang F. Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity. Science. 2016;351(6268):84-8. doi:10.1126/science.aad5227.
1.
Aguirre AJ, Meyers RM, Weir BA, et al. Genomic Copy Number Dictates a Gene-Independent Cell Response to CRISPR/Cas9 Targeting. Cancer Discov. 2016;6(8):914-29. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0154.
1.
Komor AC, Kim YB, Packer MS, Zuris JA, Liu DR. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature. 2016;533(7603):420-4. doi:10.1038/nature17946.
1.
Pattanayak V, Guilinger JP, Liu DR. Determining the specificities of TALENs, Cas9, and other genome-editing enzymes. Methods Enzymol. 2014;546:47-78. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-801185-0.00003-9.
1.
Sander JD, Ramirez CL, Linder SJ, et al. In silico abstraction of zinc finger nuclease cleavage profiles reveals an expanded landscape of off-target sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(19):e181. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt716.