Tagged with #target_intervals
0 documentation articles | 0 announcements | 1 forum discussion

No posts found with the requested search criteria.
No posts found with the requested search criteria.
Comments (1)

GATK Team:

This comment came up after some discussion with a colleague of mine:

"If you split the human genome into 100 pieces, we have to create overlapping regions so that GATK won't miss variants, but this creates a complicated situation where you may have to merge variants at the same locus."

Is it true that I would have to pad intervals and explicitly resolve variants (if called at the same locus)? If I use -L target_intervals specifying non-overlapping intervals, does GATK get a "running start" (say 50bp upstream to get variant context) before emitting variants--as samtools mpileup/bcftools claims to--or does GATK jump in directly at the start of the specified interval (and may not then call variants within some short starting interval)?

Your clarification would be much appreciated.